X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1436127006; bh=TXw4n/4ClWCMqLEdMVt6UXROXv++HBNU131QRYRFi6E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=BktLQF1sS+7ov+UvsD0EqnKg94Jz8WLR2aPlunxGhQvyhXKSVlyKeUaLVkqun+44PWzCzHaGOThab1bfBl0BTF0X3YPIzbjnN4yqZ0SiYYD5o6UyW1uAauG4h4I2aeq3xzLjx+ilMfhzx12J8Ea8l5aGBLzjTxci/r8k6PO1gcFAiWWsEywaQkqPeMp+BJzj6HcClwi9x6OeXw3fj58+MtLXfXPhGp5MKzGuh2ZFZukR8+jXRXinDsBOAnUiUJvnOuOs7BVchA+MLiXnPNXzpNIw4Plnrq83qeqbVQluhiQ321txCRTOCTghJEPA1XmgkzA+6SnZ9BJa5CXCI43Yxg==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	907673 DOT 17844 DOT bm AT smtp116 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	cbN.Pd4VM1nQHc8ZOrh7Yuz8qzt1WzphR58kpNUCIu.snqY
	F6SnZV2sbQmc1XurmMUtFZvPJDHizDczmr8M8xcPTSAZX5SSO7c6MdYBnFnB
	qMHxUtFkLJ4C0E8SwNk7r1z88s0irtW8Q.ATjEBjQCXZtdQEp9ruPZQXIHaB
	BHAL5jfSIKzv2kD9ScaCwK0TnUsun2No3Kd1fKEtFlI6FndhxW.wDUgbiv29
	TLmystpIp5eLqyv6HwzF9aaGz4Itl3sga3lhd8pM2N7n4ikbh13vrL3YmkSq
	RgH3HsX_PPzphBRNvyhqu560rKIwqVV3iGrvKakYFN4Ez3QQPm9W.8EQXt.l
	kFbgA_QmEsH__KCO204bjCxN6_bnuqa.HLbJsEcN46ZdJpeSbU.wD.dHM8Eb
	lhMpTNH6g4YbcLWDLExkcygSAQ6x6pC6VM2_QsHRSMp8W7ZWTbzm_3Qw1j2A
	8xDaqZnxSiSQVhaeA6Muol5EvHXFzo_em8Rmlv9TwlsOoRb0FkAhdMz2luUo
	JdRVhbv6.QdP_kz3iRbWU1T_oylA8SUDjcEpIg8MWdtvysT0FyHU-
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	xaem6kSswBCHwCBMr0jlCBIQdXYGmRxsm8OX6ACyP7Ho9Sk-
Message-ID:	<55998E9A.1000704@sbcglobal.net>
Date:	Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:07:54 -0700
From:	"Girvin R. Herr (gherr375 AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507040542390 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAM2RGhTRQCA5D=1XB2yELZ47nF9uu247CbJjOrJ82EJMNwPAfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150705092042 DOT 7F4318038A2D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
In-Reply-To:	<20150705092042.7F4318038A2D@turkos.aspodata.se>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Karl,
I am glad to see someone is working on the libgeda docs.  A while back I 
was looking at gsymcheck in hopes of fixing some of its problems.  
However, I could not find any documentation on the libgeda functions' 
parameters, function definitions and returned results.  Things that are 
required to understand the UI.  That hindered my reverse engineering of 
gsymcheck, since I would need to reverse engineer libgeda first.  I wish 
you well in your effort.
Girvin Herr

On 07/05/2015 02:20 AM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> Evan Foss:
>> The community of developers had a different make up 4 years ago. My
>> opinion on things is somewhere between John Dotty who is asking for
>> people to use rigger in PCB and is still developing using Scheme and
> (What is "rigger" in this context?)
>
>> Igor2 who acknowledges that Scheme is harder to find developers for.
>>
>> Imagine if the source was written in PL/I. How much development in the
>> future would you expect it to get?
> You don't have to convince me. I have a dev. account and I started
> working on libgeda docs., but real world issues has distracted me.
>
> Would enhancing the c-lib libgeda be more accepted now than for four
> years ago ?
>
> Regards,
> /Karl Hammar
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aspö Data
> Lilla Aspö 148
> S-742 94 Östhammar
> Sweden
> +46 173 140 57
>
>
>

- Raw text -