X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=rcHMgTyH2ux650QMKQB7JM+k9oVP4wSCw1KGIrOa5Xs=;
	b=E3cxwlx6JGK562i6rDQKujwiAF9yIT268akIomJaJtv4ZGQ24Sj9grRdIudQoBKaqf
	R41DFD0k43R9FBmuBn3b9jfizfXfvTUsCV2IKo6rU3wEdTmt7OUzYVTVeBJxTcmxbboW
	VtbB5diBKX3MZaojtczXMMbcd10RUOcO/JoZk3NcTuEESdaB53Jk60GNqrlEdkLxx29e
	TGC8zUWz2IaTZpdDhiNRnCN3kXo6Pw1WAacss2zJpLHrdYVX0/Ybrf4FXOIRZpVuMM4S
	5hgNxg3YtSpOJ+ZRr7AWP1RsN8dzkZcXW6urRBotuyeHfKyPwJ2lxxWmP0KGHRBih7NI
	9IgA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQmyHgHYTjj0ie/NV6DDogIBLxRV6c5W0wMD1CeTNUXZk0VvyPMDKLWkVfnbcYGEmQB8J1s5
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.184.140 with SMTP id eu12mr25251703wjc.78.1435972178970;
	Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150703030409.32398.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:09:38 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	Biswajit Das <biswajit DOT das AT efy DOT in>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--047d7bacc2c0a29f8e051a0253ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

could anybody tell me how to install gEDA. I have instaled gEDA but netlist
is not being transfer from schematic to pcb.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is
> > nearly death is wrong?
>
> Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite
> strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!
>
> The source code is there. Anyone who wants can pick it up and make a
> change. Today, tomorrow, next month and next decade.
>
> Development happens when it happens. If you need it sooner you get to
> do it yourself or pay for it to get done by someone else. You already
> know that this is the premise. You must be able to take
> responsibility for your own problems, otherwise you can not benefit
> from open source and should acquire a support contract from a service
> provider who might benefit from open source.
>
>
> And using alive and dead as measure of volunteer efforts makes no
> sense whatsoever. It implies that there exists a single threshold
> where development moves from being alive to being dead and vice
> versa. That is of course, as I wrote, utterly ridiculous.
>
> Development happens when someone makes a change.
>
> I have often experienced people who measure software project
> development simply by change quantity, which I can completely
> understand, because it is the most trivial metric, but it is also a
> really useless metric, since number of changes say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
> about whether a codebase is improving or deteriorating.
>
>
> //Peter
>

--047d7bacc2c0a29f8e051a0253ba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">could anybody tell me how to install gEDA. I have instaled=
 gEDA but <font color=3D"#ff0000">netlist is not being transfer </font>from=
 schematic to pcb.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Peter Stuge (<a href=3D"mailto:peter=
@stuge.se">peter AT stuge DOT se</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com=
">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-u=
ser AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt;</span> wro=
te:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-=
left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Stefan Salewski wrote:<br>
&gt; maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is<br>
&gt; nearly death is wrong?<br>
<br>
Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite<br>
strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!<br>
<br>
The source code is there. Anyone who wants can pick it up and make a<br>
change. Today, tomorrow, next month and next decade.<br>
<br>
Development happens when it happens. If you need it sooner you get to<br>
do it yourself or pay for it to get done by someone else. You already<br>
know that this is the premise. You must be able to take<br>
responsibility for your own problems, otherwise you can not benefit<br>
from open source and should acquire a support contract from a service<br>
provider who might benefit from open source.<br>
<br>
<br>
And using alive and dead as measure of volunteer efforts makes no<br>
sense whatsoever. It implies that there exists a single threshold<br>
where development moves from being alive to being dead and vice<br>
versa. That is of course, as I wrote, utterly ridiculous.<br>
<br>
Development happens when someone makes a change.<br>
<br>
I have often experienced people who measure software project<br>
development simply by change quantity, which I can completely<br>
understand, because it is the most trivial metric, but it is also a<br>
really useless metric, since number of changes say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING<br>
about whether a codebase is improving or deteriorating.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
<br>
//Peter<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--047d7bacc2c0a29f8e051a0253ba--

- Raw text -