delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=DARGnQ6jXeDtpfRxUBjzU99x9pJ5sYHFcRiBgCLl+JU=; | |
b=qN5JvBVPZqJBZfp0hayVvmSPc1a1+KkIKof0yqMkTfKT8QCwe5RHz8MjoOPy9yGsvQ | |
DdKggG4/mZoBmj/ncgPtxloefX3D+eCnTDpULsr1nBH2K8jEtYi7X8O6pjkHPkzwF70A | |
HBmi8vXpS1OVLBgh84vJ088ACuNQ09pEvyCFbb8VfXY76yhQZyC3rYQnDC/2OuTOd+n/ | |
fcix/ZIx/L8Hctwnl19zAJRTryT037MFXBxgzah7cw5EoqTjXN+rn7buoKgiJQ+Esk/8 | |
hacxFypbgVLL6Ua8Dc8N7wbI14LFNTdFfqO8Yuc3drJhO6jUvqHd9n3LcHApRwyZTmp1 | |
B57Q== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr36882321laj.69.1435947190242; |
Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <1435942066.672.22.camel@ssalewski.de> |
References: | <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> |
<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<1435942066 DOT 672 DOT 22 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:13:10 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhQuyymEB++nY0tJVP1qxofbx2-C5yPBvBzF5i1gQzk-bw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Ouabache, your distro does not allow for development or unstable versions? On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 08:32 -0700, Ouabache Designworks > (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> You also have the big issues like the choice of scheme as gEDAs >> scripting >> language and the gEDA file formats. Is there anything to gain by >> changing >> and if so then what would be better and how do we transition? > > I know that some people really like scheme. And I do admit that lisp > like languages are very powerful and interesting. But they are not very > popular by average people. > > I see the main problem in mixing C and scheme, which makes thinks more > complicated. Maybe that mixing was not a bad decision 30 years ago, but > today I would prefer only one single language for all. (Python or Ruby > seems to be not bad and fast enough, but my impression is that Nim or > Crystal are even better choices today.) > > For File Format: I was thinking about using JSON or YAML beside the > gschem format. The effort for that should be very low, but currently I > see no big benefit. XML may be an other alternative. > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |