X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:18 +1200
From:	Lilith Bryant <dark141 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCBGL Branch Issues
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<1402448426.13047.1.camel@pcjc2lap> (from pcjc2@cam.ac.uk on
	Wed Jun 11 13:00:26 2014)
X-Mailer:	Balsa 2.5.1-79-g9697477
Message-Id:	<1402452918.16085.11@zotlet.(none)>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s5B2FTC5012100
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2014-06-11 01:00:26 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 09:47 +1200, Lilith Bryant wrote:
> > On 2014-06-10 10:50:36 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > > Backside working using
> > > ctrl-shift-tab "x-ray-vision" doesn't fit all that well with the concept
> of
> > > 3D view. (Nor does changing the rendering order of layers like we do in
> 2D
> > > mode).
> > > 
> > > I don't remember disabling it explicitly, but as it isn't a view I often
> > > use, it may have skipped testing. Does it work if you click the button
> to go
> > > back into 2D view? 
> > 
> > No, it doesn't work in 2D view.  At this point, I'm only interested in 2D
> view.
> 
> Actually, Ctrl+Shift+Tab does work for me (at least, as I expected it
> to)...
> 
> The active component placement layer changes from top to bottom
> ("view=top", "view=bottom" in the status bar), and component placement
> occurs on the relevant layer.
> 
> There is no visual change to the displayed board, nor (IMO), would one
> make sense. The components on the side of the board AWAY from you are
> rendered in the "far side" style, as really needed to avoid confusion.
> 
> Did PCB used to behave differently? (Its been a while since I ran a non
> PCB+GL build).
> 
> 
> > My feeling is that it's only relevent in 2D view.  If 3D view
> automatically 
> > disables any such artificial mirroring it would be fine (i.e. does what it
> 
> > does at present).  
> 
> Did the old implementation play any funny tricks with layer order, or
> flipping nearside / farside colouring when Ctrl+Shift+Tab was activated?
> Did it raise the far-side components to render above the tracking
> layers?
> 
> In my opinion, what we have now works as intended - but as I say, I
> don't recall how it USED to work if that was different.
> 
> Peter

Consider, for the simplicity of explanation, of having "far side" turned OFF.

Mainline behaviour (correct):

- Track/via/pin positions stay at exactly same physical screen location
- Components from bottom now rendered instead of component from top
- If you were displaying ONLY top copper, it switches to only bottom copper

PCB+GL behaviour:

- Track/via/pin positions stay at exactly same screen location
- Components from top stays rendered.  NEVER renders bottom components*.
- If you were displaying ONLY top copper, it switches to only bottom copper

* despite "view=bottom" being clearly shown in the status bar.

i.e. the PCB+GL behaviour is a effectively no-op.

Lilith

- Raw text -