Mail Archives: geda-user/2014/03/05/06:56:47
Stefan:
> http://ssalewski.de/tmp/prop.png
I like your millimeter paper like grid.
Your transistors, do C and E have their pins inside the circle ?
About the "sym" thing; nice tought a little confusing at first.
If you show x and y, perhaps you should make a cross or something for
the symbols attachment point.
Orientaion, is that that the same as the symbols angle of rotation ?
Why do you have a checkmark for orientation, shouldn't 0 (= no rotation
suffice) ?
The checkmarks for the attributes, is that for visibility ?
I liked your nine text "Origin" circles.
The "+ - <> 100 - + 300 - +" near the bottom, what's that for ?
> Basically I am satisfied, it is compact and not too ugly.
Hmm...
> Now I wonder if gschem supports attached attributes for all elements,
> even text elements, or only for symbols, pins and nets.
T 200 200 5 8 1 1 0
test=true
{
T 100 100 5 8 1 1 0
hello=3
}
seems to work all right, move the "test" and the "3" will move along.
docs/wiki/geda-file_format_spec.html says
"Attributes are attached to the previous object."
and doesn't state any restrictions, but:
T 200 200 5 8 1 1 0
test=true
{
T 100 100 5 8 1 1 0
hello=3
{
T 300 300 5 8 1 1 0
deep=yes
}
}
didn't work.
...
> Indeed I can not really imagine what sense attributes for boxes or text
> elements can make -- but on the other hand when the attributes widget
> already exist, why not show it always.
What about (try it):
T 200 200 5 8 1 1 0
Value=2 = 8
{
T 280 280 5 5 1 1 0
power=3
}
> A related question: For boxes we have mesh and hatch, with angle and
> size parameters. Has someone ever used that for schematics? May cairo
> drawing routine supports that from the early days, but I wonder if I
> should offer all the related parameters for the user interface -- it may
> confuse beginners, and when no one use it...
Don't know.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
- Raw text -