X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=UjpHSkgcdpF3aThdpPIErW3rm+1jLFm6nHNqlLtDADQ=;
	b=CqLH+4DXmbnarCwkcK+3JcWqxQybHPgo+IMlT1T+0z1H+iLJdPQ0bzwQScRqiIImZ/
	22kZkhSwCbQDgTQ/3oAYHgASkDVdvNbtZNwaFXZqwvNax83yGJw6cBG8wv8ZIzPYciHU
	EFv/zLHvFTM5wi45C2V7ZxV5pPwygAGaE5bzdDbcctyfj9O2Jpa+fuBV/RL4BGkinnzM
	rP925jT/O6eONpZ07nnzYcVilvzifu0qIe6nu4uTaZpc+dEPllSyFOXrREtKd2RnBUlU
	enSHpoFiHXDUBEr7PgBl4ks7U5/ujtTQGMAdsGjOcEI7gV3H/NaWCsz5U5BFUNvc1ts9
	ywgA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.42.63.145 with SMTP id c17mr6335714ici.22.1358522689596;
	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:24:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CFF59BF2-A3F0-43D2-A589-A283B52C8F26@jump-ing.de>
References:	<CAFfN_23UzAVVk0-TSZyVZihFmq1-0v0gpB7o4uxe3KgxDFDG0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<57B44348-7A53-4743-8A60-7C9D31EFD1ED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAFfN_22hFE7AtMCXLvT-Up6ZxF=TZ7eYmr+PO5YbeFy7OU7Q0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20130117144225 DOT 30d2507f AT svelte>
	<1DCD2904-101A-4EDF-A5F5-4B137ACD71E8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CFF59BF2-A3F0-43D2-A589-A283B52C8F26 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:24:49 -0200
Message-ID:	<CAFfN_22jxGdxE0_U4HBuXeJaYxS1TvaYF-Zg3oQQe=QysKN0uA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] libgeda circle parsing
From:	=?UTF-8?Q?Antonio_Todo_Bom_=E2=9C=88?= <atodobom AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--90e6ba3fcd87552bb704d391b6c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, Nevertheless ...
The radius can be zero, but if you have thickness theoretically would be
shown on paper. But when I can reach a zero radius circle, it is invisible
at the screen.

But I see that we left out a bit of the question I asked, as the code.

I just mentioned that if the code checks null or negative radius, why he
corrects to zero?

I think of two things:
- Or just check if there are negative radius.
- Or correct to a value known as a standard.

I'm just saying that I see no sense in the routine check if it is zero,
then mention it as a mistake, and then to correct to zero anyway.

This was just a moment of philosophy in programming  :)

Anyway, I sometimes have some invisible entities left across the design.
And I think is relevant to "seek and destroy it" , or just turn them
visible anyway :D

Regards,
Antonio

--90e6ba3fcd87552bb704d391b6c2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Yes, Nevertheless ...</div><div>The radius can be zer=
o, but if you have thickness theoretically would be shown on paper. But whe=
n I can reach a zero radius circle, it is invisible at the screen.</div><di=
v>
<br></div><div>But I see that we left out a bit of the question I asked, as=
 the code.</div><div><br></div><div>I just mentioned that if the code check=
s null or negative radius, why he corrects to zero?</div><div><br></div>
<div>I think of two things:</div><div>- Or just check if there are negative=
 radius.</div><div>- Or correct to a value known as a standard.</div><div><=
br></div><div>I&#39;m just saying that I see no sense in the routine check =
if it is zero, then mention it as a mistake, and then to correct to zero an=
yway.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This was just a moment of philosophy in programming =A0=
:)</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, I sometimes have some invisible entitie=
s left across the design. And I think is relevant to &quot;seek and destroy=
 it&quot; , or just turn them visible anyway :D</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Antonio</div></div>

--90e6ba3fcd87552bb704d391b6c2--

- Raw text -