X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20120427002113.27271.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:21:13 +0200
From:	Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To:	coreboot AT coreboot DOT org, geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: [coreboot] Dual SPI Flash adapter attempt 2.0
Mail-Followup-To:	coreboot AT coreboot DOT org, geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<4F915B7C DOT 9000009 AT schinagl DOT nl> <4F959E1F DOT 6010803 AT schinagl DOT nl> <4F997E2E DOT 7010306 AT schinagl DOT nl> <4F99CEFD DOT 10707 AT schinagl DOT nl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4F99CEFD.10707@schinagl.nl>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> So the big question is; shall I send this to seeed for fabrication
> or does it need some big change?

One last thing (I think) is to check if the 20 mil = 0.5 mm Y-axis
clearance between the individual boards will actually work.

Even the 60 mil = 1.52 mm X-axis clearance is rather small if they
are doing a disk cut.

If they only V score the outline and then break them apart
mechanically then the 20 mil is fine. The boards I have do have flush
edges however, so they were disc cut, and the disc is likely wider
than 0.5 mm => you need to increase Y clearance or perhaps simply
throw out the U1 pins and make it SO only.


//Peter

- Raw text -