X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] use-license: unlimited, dist-license: GPL
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<4F6A36A5.10807@laserlinc.com>
References:	<4F6A36A5 DOT 10807 AT laserlinc DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:18:15 +0100
Message-ID:	<1332364695.2535.18.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Evolution 2.32.3
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 16:14 -0400, Joshua Lansford wrote:
> Hi,
>    I know this is probably hashed over and over, but I have done a fair 
> bit of searching before asking.  I am developing schematics which can't 
> become GPL.

I was going to ask a very related question some months ago, based on a
discussion in a german forum...

Someone said that he can not use free tools like gEDA/KiCAD because he
can not check the licenses of every symbol and footprint to be
compatible with his commercial EDA product.

So, should we group symbols and footprints in free, GPL, ... to make
commercial use easier?

- Raw text -