delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/02/09/12:56:37

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20120209175526.27071.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:55:26 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Compiling gEDA/gaf with llvm/clang is supported
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <3a220e2814a25d46dfdaf4a4aef0542c AT mail DOT theimps DOT com> <CAOuGh89+wzDLW+QK2o3Tgt8cC8ROm2VVXbegQ5QsFu8nNOuWtg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOuGh89+wzDLW+QK2o3Tgt8cC8ROm2VVXbegQ5QsFu8nNOuWtg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Bob Paddock wrote:
> is there any functional reasons to prefer one over the other such
> as run time speed of the program for example?

I believe gcc still generates better optimized code for x86.


//Peter

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019