delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2011/12/22/16:16:41

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=e4jPFW1Hbtgs/8xAeeP+TrDw2CQHn4qvIag9sgDireg=;
b=aJyHtpSJWppXeuAZIFjG3qWCV2CDyhFex9CmePMh4Tu//vM9nh1nzUh9mMYQXHhCfl
DgesnfVOZKdRBWk76ODrmRTsZWq7/wyO+h7SdLpU2Lo6bFk6lv4y68AMXcU5PmldhhKB
GlVAI4seA0X90YrkhMnXV3zZVkKodzUgoV3Dw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4EF29256.8090001@verizon.net>
References: <CALSZ9godJsJDhBd_PaCiWPx9M8GyKz8PW1wVUs6NxVgtrOS-Fw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<4EF29256 DOT 8090001 AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:15:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CALSZ9gqG+ED=T-A2bR4frspLh+9MR2HDJzib42TqnDomnV5uSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Design suggestions...
From: Rob Butts <r DOT butts2 AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

--0015175936708b8fa904b4b4ce09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

So I think I can kludge this one with everybodies suggestions.

Thanks




On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Ethan Swint <eswint DOT ramu AT verizon DOT net>wrote:

> On 12/21/2011 12:11 PM, Rob Butts wrote:
>
>> My application has two 12 v dc motors that I want to operate in both
>> directions with speed control. I have two potentiometers to determine speed
>> control for each motor. I have one push button and three to five switches
>> for state control.
>>
>> I initially didn't plan on speed control for each motor and I had a
>> PICKit 2 so I opted for the Low Pin Count development board with the setup
>> for the pic16F690 microprocessor.  The documentation for that
>> microprocessor says the pmw can be set up for one, two or four channels but
>> it has just one pwm module.
>>
>> The processor that microchip suggests has more pins and I'd have to
>> purchase more development hardware.  I have the code completed and working
>> for the five input state controller and the two adcs monitoring the motor
>> speed potentiometers.  Does anyone have suggestions for speed and direction
>> control of the two motors where I don't have to purchase new development
>> hardware?  I thought about two micros in a master slave configuration but
>> that would make development and prototyping on my desk difficult.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
> The four pins will be sufficient - you'll need a gate driver.  Put each
> motor in an H-bridge configuration, i.e. totem-pole two mosfets on each
> side.  The low-side transistors will be your direction selectors - turn on
> the left for CW, turn on right for CCW, low-frequency, run a GPIO pin from
> the MCU.  The hi-side transistors will take the PWM signals (2 for each
> motor, 4 total) - the gate drivers will have a boot-strap power supply to
> drive the hi-side gate.  I'd suggest a toggle switch for direction &
> running and the pot just to set the speed - otherwise finding 'zero' speed
> on the pot will be hard.  You can just take the max raw ADC value and scale
> that to your max PWM counter value, a simple multiply-by-constant.  PWM
> frequency of 15kHz won't annoy most people over 30yrs, but 20kHz would be
> better.
>
> On your layout, keep the loop tight from +12V across the 2-FET totem to
> ground, bypass with a few hundred nF of ceramic caps so that the parasitic
> inductance on the PCB won't over-voltage the FETs and toast them -
> typically 10x capacitance of a FET's capacitance, given on the spec sheet.
>  Several caps in parallel will get their ESR lower so that they handle the
> transient more effectively, too.
>
> The flyback current from the motor will go through the body diode of the
> FETs, but make sure you have sufficient time of zero PWM on the top when
> reversing, e.g. >50uSec.  If you accidentally turn on the top FET while the
> bottom is turned on (or the body diode reverse recovery), you can
> over-current the FETs and toast them in one PWM cycle.
>
> No capacitors across the motor - you effectively have two mismatched
> voltage sources in parallel and the current spike will kill the FETs.  No
> resistor in series with the motor is needed, either - that just wastes
> energy.
>
> -Ethan
>

--0015175936708b8fa904b4b4ce09
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>So I think I can kludge this one with everybodies suggestions.</div><d=
iv>=A0</div><div>Thanks</div><div>=A0</div><div><br><br>=A0</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Ethan Swint <span dir=3D"=
ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eswint DOT ramu AT verizon DOT net">eswint DOT ramu AT verizon DOT net=
</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-=
color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">On 12/21/2011 12:11 PM, =
Rob Butts wrote:<br>

<blockquote style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-=
color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class=
=3D"gmail_quote">
My application has two 12 v dc motors that I want to operate in both direct=
ions with speed control. I have two potentiometers to determine speed contr=
ol for each motor. I have one push button and three to five switches for st=
ate control.<br>

<br>
I initially didn&#39;t plan on speed control for each motor and I had a PIC=
Kit 2 so I opted for the Low Pin Count development board with the setup for=
 the pic16F690 microprocessor. =A0The documentation for that microprocessor=
 says the pmw can be set up for one, two or four channels but it has just o=
ne pwm module.<br>

<br>
The processor that microchip suggests has more pins and I&#39;d have to pur=
chase more development hardware. =A0I have the code completed and working f=
or the five input state controller and the two adcs monitoring the motor sp=
eed potentiometers. =A0Does anyone have suggestions for speed and direction=
 control of the two motors where I don&#39;t have to purchase new developme=
nt hardware? =A0I thought about two micros in a master slave configuration =
but that would make development and prototyping on my desk difficult.<br>

<br>
Thanks,<br>
Rob <br>
</blockquote></div></div>
The four pins will be sufficient - you&#39;ll need a gate driver. =A0Put ea=
ch motor in an H-bridge configuration, i.e. totem-pole two mosfets on each =
side. =A0The low-side transistors will be your direction selectors - turn o=
n the left for CW, turn on right for CCW, low-frequency, run a GPIO pin fro=
m the MCU. =A0The hi-side transistors will take the PWM signals (2 for each=
 motor, 4 total) - the gate drivers will have a boot-strap power supply to =
drive the hi-side gate. =A0I&#39;d suggest a toggle switch for direction &a=
mp; running and the pot just to set the speed - otherwise finding &#39;zero=
&#39; speed on the pot will be hard. =A0You can just take the max raw ADC v=
alue and scale that to your max PWM counter value, a simple multiply-by-con=
stant. =A0PWM frequency of 15kHz won&#39;t annoy most people over 30yrs, bu=
t 20kHz would be better.<br>

<br>
On your layout, keep the loop tight from +12V across the 2-FET totem to gro=
und, bypass with a few hundred nF of ceramic caps so that the parasitic ind=
uctance on the PCB won&#39;t over-voltage the FETs and toast them - typical=
ly 10x capacitance of a FET&#39;s capacitance, given on the spec sheet. =A0=
Several caps in parallel will get their ESR lower so that they handle the t=
ransient more effectively, too.<br>

<br>
The flyback current from the motor will go through the body diode of the FE=
Ts, but make sure you have sufficient time of zero PWM on the top when reve=
rsing, e.g. &gt;50uSec. =A0If you accidentally turn on the top FET while th=
e bottom is turned on (or the body diode reverse recovery), you can over-cu=
rrent the FETs and toast them in one PWM cycle.<br>

<br>
No capacitors across the motor - you effectively have two mismatched voltag=
e sources in parallel and the current spike will kill the FETs. =A0No resis=
tor in series with the motor is needed, either - that just wastes energy.<b=
r>
<font color=3D"#888888">
<br>
-Ethan<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>

--0015175936708b8fa904b4b4ce09--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019