delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2017/10/07/00:30:11.3

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rod Pemberton <EmailNullFile AT voenflacbe DOT cpm>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DOSBox?
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:14:17 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <or9k8d$b7j$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <or6bl4$pdo$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
<xnshexxjpr DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com>
<or7gpa$jti$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
<59d767c6$0$9406$426a74cc AT news DOT free DOT fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ZTD62cW/Uw8bymX5ok+0NA.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT aioe DOT org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Bytes: 3575
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 06 Oct 2017 11:23:50 GMT
Mateusz Viste <mateusz AT wont DOT tell> wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 05:02:47 -0400, Rod Pemberton wrote:

> > Apparently, you can't read, nor comprehend.  I quoted the RFC for
> > you  
> 
> Getting old & ranty, eh ? :)

At least, I'm not being hostile, inciting unnecessary arguments,
responding off-topic, spamming the group, nor lying, as Dj did.  :)

> I definitely agree with Dj that it's not something anyone can or
> should impose, even less so in a harsh way.

Where did I tell the OP something in a "harsh" way?  The question is
why did you take it to be harsh?

RP> This is not a Google Group.  We bottom post on Usenet, as it's
RP> difficult to follow longer posts when top posted.

...

> The fact that Rugxulo obviously answered from outside of the Usenet
> calls for an even higher dose of tolerance.

I'm confused by that.  Why?  He follows Usenet etiquette and standards.

> Still, if one would really want to go anal about this RFC stuff, then:
> 
> 1. RFC are no standards, otherwise they wouldn't be called "RFCs" in
> the first place

Please feel free to point out the Internet standards which are NOT
titled as RFCs.  (I.e., there are none because RFCs are the standards.)

> 2. The very same RFC you mention does say:
> 
> "this Guide offers a minimum set of behaviors which organizations and
>  individuals may take and adapt for their own use."
>              ^^^

Yes, if you're a bunch of individuals within an organization, you may
adapt it for your own use.  I.e., it says "and" not "or".   If it said
"or," it would mean separate individuals unrelated to the organization.

> Even if the RFCs were any kind of golden rule that everyone has to
> follow (which they are not!), this particular RFC makes itself
> optional anyway.
> 

It's still the norm to bottom-post to Usenet groups.

> > If you were familiar with any other Usenet group, e.g., going back
> > to the 1980's, as I am, then you'd also know that it is the norm
> > everywhere on Usenet to correct bottom-posted posts  
> 
> In this line of thoughts, you could also add that flaming around with 
> nonsense about bottom- vs top- vs thread-posting was also the norm 
> "everywhere on Usenet". Let's not get back to that.
> 

Yes, exactly.  So, why don't you ask Dj to stop initiating such
divisive conflict?  I simply informed the OP of the truth of the
matter.  Dj wrongly took offense to that and incited an argument.


Rod Pemberton
-- 
If you're upset over excessive use of force by police, leave your
basketball court or football field, go down to your police station and
picket.  You can do that peacefully any day of the week without
disrespecting the American flag.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019