X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.236.25.35 with SMTP id y23mr51080278yhy.9.1432122022453;
	Wed, 20 May 2015 04:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"Rod Pemberton" <fork AT lllljunkqwer DOT cpm>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2015 07:40:37 -0400
Organization:	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines:	50
Message-ID:	<op.xyxmpzr4whxjl4@localhost>
References:	<201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com>
	<555829A6 DOT 8010502 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vA73qPvoDFytp3FeW6bCD1-XuGsFFoDinoKn2KYY1fkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<555870E8 DOT 7040302 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vDhD6BJj89o1i0FRd2U0H4bTpGGN4zH6qs7FJKxzqhuQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505180114 DOT t4I1EiaX017288 AT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCyrQ_+Yq6XsRD-UO4r=j9WoGGiXoqQFrkbiEQpzX+=MA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505181216 DOT t4ICGaKO014123 AT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCk5MY74z+HNVzzdLByg71Y_9ObK-1jPxJ_KF8eqRDZMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zj52dkns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAPcN+MKC_2tcZqVmo9gvF2Cxdo+K+-qfKaNrQuCkMnEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83wq05eukk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vBKihqvw152LsGvWEiSei7TczN6Vmxsvebtnoz_E5=u4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83twv9espx DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vC8ge-O+yDkTeXf351E+bpURkxOGmvdp19JTMnCjfkZbA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83siater66 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <op DOT xyvgdewswhxjl4 AT localhost>
	<201505191705 DOT t4JH57E8010700 AT delorie DOT com> <op DOT xywnlzarwhxjl4 AT localhost>
	<201505192352 DOT t4JNqpaK025569 AT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	n4wpt9zq8xR26Ttf9mo2BA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT aioe DOT org
User-Agent:	Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)
X-Notice:	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Bytes:	3712
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 19 May 2015 19:52:51 -0400, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>> >> rudely
>> >
>> > So you see it.  I don't.
>>
>> This is going to sound rude, but you don't "see"
>> rudeness.  Well, I doubt that anyone "sees" rudeness ...
>
> Just for the sake of completeness, the expression I abbreviated is
> "You see it that way, I don't see it that way."  I'm merely noting
> that point of view is important in interpreting some things.
>
>> You stated you "can't even tell when my brother is
>> joking in an email, and I've known him all his life".
>>
>> If you can't detect humor,
>
> No, his humor just doesn't translate to email.  He thinks he's funny,
> nobody else does.  Is it still humor?  He thinks so, I don't.

How is that any different from my reply to Eli?  He thinks he's
helping but the way he responds he only makes others angry ...
I explained this in depth and politely.  This is documented, or
rather, archived.  Yet, you took issue with me pointing that out
to him, but you have no issue with pointing out basically the same
thing of your brother.

"Pot calling the kettle black ..."

>> how are you able to detect rudeness?  I think that's a fair
>> question.  Don't you?
>
> It's a fair question.  The answer is "Rudeness is what I think
> rudeness is".  It's a personal opinion.  Mine is not always the
> same as yours.

If everything of fact and truth is just personal opinion to you,
then what gives you the right to belittle and disrupt my serious
reply to Eli?  It's my personal opinion according to your
perspective and has every right to stand as is because "mine
is not always the same as yours."  Doesn't it?  That's the only
logical outcome given what you've stated.


Rod Pemberton

-- 
If fewer guns reduced murders, how does one explain
Moscow, Chicago, New York, and South Africa?

- Raw text -