X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=wM9mva8Qm1v3LkXHrordQlXfzwpJsP4v/qtDEBinTIc=;
	b=E44nxFulXuJ3Yuu3uBu/96ZsuIARaxHQGgxDZDheAccloVHZkmnpVGzY5ph9UfNOo+
	FJ/uCkGnwR6Zzc/Fl06EybrPJpq6PKW7Qu7GctvOfG4S6ROTvPl9Yra/mUoeD+mGVZ3L
	wSS4GGk4iAlfg7mhAhVnfOrNfcLuv/5QzIs2oZuwaKKR1Pf8SQ0jkRzhWxLTaSyVdsts
	iFopXN2jI6gpiTupEy3R/u2PRBAllJVJOoVTOAVI5/iQh2x3tjYYMjpdDQuxVGvPOqwz
	ljcFc8yJoxaHVAg3E67a66SEsQQC4fRpNNa5Qp78A++Pps0ZBqFlNQFQb7IU/Vv0DRIi
	CfyA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.42.81.201 with SMTP id a9mr20077205icl.9.1431676303214; Fri,
	15 May 2015 00:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<831tiii8vj.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<CAA2C=vCgLHdH3BJxastGzUsJzhiRddytiYwB1MP_aaiiVpC4nA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83k2wcjt8e DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vB-YiGkyx5dJpa=hcBh0O4_NiEKh2tKm5OHyNX3vW7HsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83bnhojnwh DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAEKFUktuYXGN_eYUEY0JuHQgXR_-q-N8xox=7PHPEqqw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<838ucsjnbl DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAK_T9ixd6YpNrd2LYL80Lau-Dbf+T5vo89AdYXS0WYOw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83vbfvi3t1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAUa61rumTN9fyCDdtdGXzqfzZLdtz4Nw+8gWX-J-x0bg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5554DF05 DOT 7020707 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vD_NVLdHdqz8RSUeU3VniwrQ85=fn+WD0+pxMbZziuyHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55556DFF DOT 8020400 AT iki DOT fi>
	<831tiii8vj DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2015 10:51:43 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vA+iQLL5DcPASLq-1=SypW+iXrb_uoFN4fprgyE1m7ogg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: bad pragma in dir.h? (and our structrure packing)
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 5/15/15, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 06:54:39 +0300
>> From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>>
>> We need to be sure that such typedef will not cause warnings about unused
>> typedef for some GCC
>> versions.
>
> Which GCC versions do that?

gcc 4.7+

>  How can they produce such warnings
> without complaining about system header files, which are replete with
> unused typedefs?  At the very least, they should exempt header files,
> or at least system header files, which these are.
>
> So I find it hard to believe this could be a problem.
>

IIUC, the warnings are only for local typedefs within function bodies
and not for global ones.

- Raw text -