X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<5543C6E6.4090709@iki.fi>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2015 21:33:10 +0300
From:	Andris Pavenis <andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC 5.1.0 problem with <dos.h>
References:	<mhmgck$ims$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl> <201504280005 DOT t3S05t2U020439 AT delorie DOT com> <mhnhb8$m7m$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl> <201504281718 DOT t3SHIpWZ009266 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55434021 DOT 4010606 AT iki DOT fi>
In-Reply-To:	<55434021.4010606@iki.fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 05/01/2015 11:58 AM, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 08:18 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Ah, I see.
>>
>> I see no reason to not spin a 2.05 release just to get this out, but
>> the only other issue we've had stopping this is the malloc one. IIRC
>> the last concern I had with changing malloc was breaking the ABI, but
>> if Juan and Andris can agree on what malloc "works" we'll just go with
>> that and have something that can replace both 2.03 and 2.04.
>>
>>
> I have updated nmalloc (sorry for 2 missing headers accidentally left out of first commit),
>
> I also restored src/rmake.cc (missing since v2.02) but used by testsuite. Could it really be true 
> that nobody have dries to build testsuite for so long time.
>
> Also some other changes like adding make variables EXTRA_CLAGS and EXTRA_CXXFLAGS so that extra 
> flags are visible in make output. Used this to workaround cmalloc() problem (GCC-5.1 compiles it 
> to infinite tail recursion at optimization levels 2+).
>
> So library now seems to build OK. Should do some more testing with real software.

Some testing:

- built CVS version of DJGPP with gcc-5.1.0 and installed
- built GMP-6.0.0a and reinstalled: no problems, all tests pass OK
- built MPFR-3.1.2 and installed: no problems, all tests pass OK
- build MPC-1.0.3 and installed: no problems, all tests pass OK (rebuilt also with DJGPP v2.03 and 
should upload sometime as it is new version)
- built MPFRCX-0.4.2 (polynomial algenra based on MPC, MPFR, MPC): all tests pass OK

- built cln-1.3.4 and reinstalled. All included tests pass OK
- built GiNaC-1.6.2 and reinstalled. All included tests pass OK.
(see http://www.ginac.de/ for more details about CLN and GiNaC)

I do not currently plan to do more testing now. So I think than new beta v2.05 would be OK unless 
there is objections. After that we could wait for some month before release.

Andris

- Raw text -