X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=BO6J2uD3OccEK36RjLfxG8KzXfofdAOUU0AcVxvTK8M=;
	b=S0cMLh5niJObohnSKI50HHOQtVOxd6ilamxJS7zFe+XpFlJm6Z77gnBLZSIgVrvrs4
	CPopnipbi1ZZD+pxRAXXxsGSo8TGEhAzMzF2ITcQATpDiUYtxUM4QoO/+FRpoP/zaqIY
	4tJo+xGvTUhllooKyn3F7xEbFIzuPRdTk/s2k=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<83zkincty6.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<201108310027 DOT 22056 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<E1Qye2f-0005Iu-TI AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org>
	<201108312117 DOT 54522 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<j3op85$567$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org>
	<038ae4ff-44f2-4ad2-b806-a6ed9b6085a2 AT o9g2000vbo DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83zkincty6 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:07:28 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vB+NVB4M3uZpk5_GiNuYquh4VVk0cpYt=Q-+dq4FppfZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: gcc difficulties on MSDOS 6.22 with LFN driver installed
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8287WIJ019759
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
>> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
>>
>> OFYI, I have djgpp 2.03 installed on the same partition with the same
>> MSDOS 6.22 so I can choose if I want to compile with 2.04 or 2.03.
>> gcc 4.6.1 and djgpp-2.03 work flawlessly.
>
> Wait a minute.  Are you saying that the problem is _only_ with GCC
> compiled with DJGPP 2.04, and that 2.03-compiled GCC works?  I don't
> think you said that before.
>
> If you compile with v2.03 a simple program that calls 7A46, and then
> run it with DOSLFN, does it also fail?
>
> If so, this is certainly due to the use of 7A46, because in v2.03
> `filelength' didn't call that function and `lfilelength' didn't exist

AFAICS, filelength() calls 71A6, not 7A46.  (Typo?)
OTOH, filelength() from 2.03 didn't call 71A6 either.

> at all.
>
> So I think we need to fix these 2 functions to work around this
> problem.
>

- Raw text -