X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:08:00 -0600
Date:	Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:08:00 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa AT zytor DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Operator <?= and >?=
References:	<4701333A DOT 000003 DOT 04248 AT SOW> <1191315419 DOT 579478 DOT 26590 AT 19g2000hsx DOT googlegroups DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<1191315419.579478.26590@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID:	<-L6dnUPkk8rtOqranZ2dnUVZ_s7inZ2d@comcast.com>
Lines:	19
X-Usenet-Provider:	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host:	67.169.144.158
X-Trace:	sv3-Wyx31LLnpn3gH+mv1qBxXGeFkafJzApAfQMP2tgJcs6srC9TR7rQX+xSaz7ETYbv4B3iOK4CXgq8g7d!FH/9WCzHR1eZ+LGyid7gtV2cSt9jZYNnWjbeX+Utwbx9MQSf9mlRKaKupz9Lwn5eCN/vD9LsKXgD!IBv88EKRIiAoixo882sj1rvMLvDncHo=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT comcast DOT net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:	dmca AT comcast DOT net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter:	1.3.35
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Carey Evans wrote:
> On Oct 2, 6:49 am, "Mahbub" <mozad DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> Why the operators <?= and >?= (min and max) are not supported in DJGPP? Is
>> there any plan to add them in future?
> 
> The GCC 4.2 changelog at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html says:
> 
>     The <?, >?, <?=, and >?= operators, deprecated in previous GCC
> releases, have been removed.
> 
> They're not standard C, so I doubt they'll be back.  If you need them
> you'll need to use one of the older versions of GCC.
> 

Instead of removing them, they (the gcc people) probably should have 
pushed them for inclusion in C0x (C1x?), as they're useful.  Of course, 
maybe they did for C99 and they were rejected.

	-hpa

- Raw text -