delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:53:48 -0500 |
From: | "Jeff Marshall" <coder AT execulink DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
References: | <OF498E9CAE DOT 9F13DD95-ON8725729C DOT 00655F56-8725729C DOT 0065894D AT seagate DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: djgpp daily digest for 11 Mar 2007 |
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:54:30 -0500 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 |
Message-ID: | <IfGdndseFLORdWjYnZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@golden.net> |
Lines: | 41 |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 67.158.72.187 |
X-Trace: | sv3-gVUGHHvA5BaDFowvEGy66JDDrp8P8yadTY1xIlmK/6tzX7CdvmoEAn98F2Sv6sm8vy8KZttXLTFvV/N!V1TuZR8+29AnPq0yZgxJ+Jsa55fvALKxxyYevyIQ+FfyBGXAKYjW/WHJP98l6k+mltzQlHMeOecy!SV6oohCtxSj/QPMgJAx2Q/s= |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT golden DOT net |
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: | abuse AT golden DOT net |
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
X-Postfilter: | 1.3.34 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Thanks, cool. I will put a little more effort in to this next time round. If it is helpful, I don't mind working on this. As I mentioned, we kind of need to do it for our project anyways, but I don't want to trip over work that you have already started. But ... if I was to do some work on this in the hopes of preparing a patch file, where should I start. With the last official release + djdev from CVS? Are there any "must have" patches I should apply before starting? I have been keeping notes of what I've been doing so far here: http://www.execulink.com/~coder/fb/bin/ in the file djgpp_building.txt. Those binaries are probably only good for FreeBASIC temporarily since I have learned of a few mistakes I've made since making them. Also, they are not correctly packaged: still learning on that. In otherwords, I wouldn't use those binaries as-is. <Gordon DOT Schumacher AT seagate DOT com> wrote in message news:OF498E9CAE DOT 9F13DD95-ON8725729C DOT 00655F56-8725729C DOT 0065894D AT seagate DOT com.. . > "Jeff Marshall" <coder AT execulink DOT com> wrote on Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:33:48 > -0500: > > # 2) gcc 3.4.4. I had no problems compiling djdev204 using gcc 3.4.4. Any > # plans to make djdev buildable with gcc 4.x? We plan to ( one day ) use > gcc > # as a backend to FreeBASIC. Updating the djdev sources is the kind of > thing > # one of us would have to do one day anyway and it would be great to hear > if > # someone has this "in the works" but we would also be willing to help > forward > # djdev in this direction if given the opportunity. > > I've been successfully building djdev204 with GCC 4.1.0. I believe that > I've had to make some minor fixes (and turn off -Werror for the time > being) but I have not gotten those changes into CVS yet... > > So, the short answer is "yes". :) >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |