Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/09/22/10:31:04.1
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
|
From: | Cesar Rabak <crabak AT acm DOT org>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: bnu214s compiled for djgpp 2.04 alpha
|
Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:29:48 -0300
|
Lines: | 39
|
Message-ID: | <41518C5C.1000306@acm.org>
|
References: | <1095849299 DOT 415155532ce78 AT webmail DOT wilkes DOT edu>
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Trace: | news.uni-berlin.de ZdwP+XnOyaGOsa8NtFGIIwiq3z44kuiQ/u1EuDpPPE/jF0icY=
|
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
|
X-Accept-Language: | pt-br, pt
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
fdonahoe AT wilkes DOT edu escreveu:
> Cesar Rabak on Tuesday, 21 September wrote:
>
>
>>Does the mpz_aorsmul_1 function definition starts on line 61 of
>>aorsmul_i.c, or there is a 'void' in the previous line?
>>
>>If there is the 'void' in aorsmul_i.c, then could you please run:
>>
>>gcc -E aorsmul_i.c -o aorsmul_i.i
>>
>>and see how the declaration at line 628 expands?
>
>
> ...> gcc -E -I. mpz/aorsmul_i.c -o aorsmul_i.i
>
> Gives this for line 628
>
> # 628 "./gmp-impl.h"
> void __gmpz_aorsmul_1 (mp_size_t sub,mpz_ptr w,mpz_srcptr u,mp_limb_t
> v) __attribute__ ((regparm (1)));
[snipped
> And for good measure, this for line 60
>
> # 60 "mpz/aorsmul_i.c"
> void
> __gmpz_aorsmul_1 (mp_size_t sub,mpz_ptr w,mpz_srcptr x,mp_limb_t y)
> {
[snipped]
They don't look to have any clash between declaration and definition for
me. Is there by any chance another declaration of __gmpz_aorsmul_1 that
might be already in force (by a define or ifdef mechanism not tuned for
the build)?
--
Cesar Rabak
- Raw text -