X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:08:59 -0400
Message-Id:	<200409101808.i8AI8xL4009069@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<4141e908$0$175$cc7c7865@news.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on 10 Sep 2004 17:48:56 GMT)
Subject:	Re: compiling djgpp: which gcc?
References:	<20040909150711 DOT GC9890 AT webhome DOT cz> <mbr2k0tcd4k1a7de9lhev6j6jr0k5gictq AT 4ax DOT com> <20040910130940 DOT GD21756 AT webhome DOT cz> <4141e908$0$175$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se>
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Nope. We don't have time to follow this newsgroup 100%. And if you
> wanted to talk to the DJGPP developers, you should use the
> djgpp-workers mailing list.

That's not quite how it works.  The djgpp-workers list is for talking
about working on djgpp itself.  It is not a generic method for
contacting the workers.  I don't want people thinking "Oh, I'll ask my
generic C programming question on djgpp-workers because that's where
the smart people hang out".  I *do* want people thinking "I've got
some free time and I'd like to fiddle with djgpp's C library, so I'll
ask for advice on djgpp-workers".

> Perhaps it's been too long or I've done it so many times, but I
> think it very easy to compile libc. Just unzip the source and go
> down into src and type "make".

When it works, yeah, it's that easy.

> This is where beginners' questions should be made. However
> beginners' questions regarding libc implementation or compiling are
> better posted to djgpp-workers and are welcome there.

True.

> Anyway there is very little activity on djgpp-workers as almost none
> have any time for it anymore. So we welcome anyone that want to
> correct bugs.

I like to think of it as "there's little left to do because it all
works so well" :-)

- Raw text -