Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/01/05/09:05:05
> From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:41:06 -0500
>
> Why the h*** "h***" is filtered out but g0d is n0t? Isn't this a
> discrimination after all? why g0d is better and less offensive than h***? is
> there a proof? Btw, if we have a word which assumes existance of the
> opposite meaning, we can suppress use of either of these words.
That's a wrong attitude. Please accept that it is offensive as an
axiom, and refrain from using it. DJ's spam filter is very good, it
is constantly improved and maintained, and chances that it will be
changed given questions of the ``why not?'' type are less than slim.
There's enough ways to express anything you want without using this,
or other similar words.
Morover, when you choose words carefully, you might also find a better
way of saying what you need to tell.
> You know, when a parent doesn't buy to his/her child an expensive toy it can
> be treatead (from child's point of view) as an insult and can be carried out
> without much saying about it. :)
How many children do you have? That's not how _my_ kids react when I
don't buy them something they want.
- Raw text -