Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/11/08/15:45:22
On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Tal Lavi wrote:
> Actually, that makes sense, inlining is done in compile time, not in link
> time, right?
Right.
> Is there a way over this problem? Those routines are called very frequently,
> and not inlining them may cause a huge performance issue.
``May cause'' or ``does cause''? There's a big difference between these
two. I suggest to profile the program before you go to extremes like
that.
The way to inline library functions is to copy their definitions into
your source, or to write your own substitutes for them. Is it really
worth this hassle?
Which functions are those, btw?
- Raw text -