delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/05/17/18:21:31

Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3968
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: PMODE for DJ
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 11:39:31 CDT
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <319cabc3.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <199605161900 DOT PAA24410 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> What advantages does DPMI 1.0 have ?

A whole bunch, but PMODE is NOT DPMI 1.0.  As a matter of fact, it has less
DPMI 1.0 functionality than CWSDPMI does (so you don't get null pointer
protection, for example).

> Could I make a standalone program with this ?  If so, what .exe size 
> should I expect ?  (I'm thinkin' of an installer, ya see.. =)

The only PMODE stub configuration is for a standalone program currently.
The PMODE stub is like 14Kb in size, so the overall packaging savings 
vs the V2.0 2K stub and 25K CWSDPMI would be around 13Kb.  The distribution
conditions of a modified stub.asm + modified pmode need to be determined -
you might need to ship source which would negate the size savings.  

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019