Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/08/26/08:18:28
On Fri, 25 Aug 1995, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> If someone posts what the bug in TBAV is, maybe an alternate way of linking
> can workaround the bug. There is nothing virus-like in the stub to trigger
> such a warning. The source is available for the stub, so someone with this
> buggy scanner needs to find out what it doesn't like.
>
well, this is what TBAV says on all djgpp2 programs:
Heuristic flags: c!?ZK AT i
c No checksum / recovery information (Anti-Vir.Dat) available.
! Invalid opcode (non-8088 instructions) or out-of-range branch.
? Inconsistent exe-header. Might be a virus but can also be a bug.
Z EXE/COM determination. The program tries to check whether a file
is a COM or EXE file. Viruses need to do this to infect a program.
K Unusual stack. The program has a suspicious stack or an odd stack.
@ Encountered instructions which are not likely to be generated by
an assembler, but by some code generator like a polymorphic virus.
i Additional data found at end of file. Probably internal overlay.
- Raw text -