Mail Archives: djgpp/1992/05/19/09:08:08
>
> However, after thinking about it, it's not clear to me that the best
> long-term solution is to change go32. It might make more sense to
> port Gnu make to DJGPP, and make it use response files. I might work
> on that if I get the time, but I suspect that this would be a fair
> amount of work.
Hm. This would mean, a 32bit make (with go32 no1) calls a 32bit gcc
(go32 no2) that calls a 32bit cc1plus or -obj (go32 no3). We need a
system32() some day, dont we?
> p.s. I REALLY DO appreciate all the work you've done, DJ. DOS
> would be a lot less palatable without gnu emacs and gcc.
True.
- Thomas
greve AT rs1 DOT thch DOT uni-bonn DOT de
unt145 AT dbnrhrz1
- Raw text -