Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/05/07/02:33:48
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Javier Bardal Prieto wrote:
> Hello Andris:
> I have tried to build some gcc snapshots, these are two examples:
> gcc-20020415.tar.bz2 18.403.672 bytes
> gcc-20020422.tar.bz2 18.637.459 bytes
> gcc31s2.zip 32.982 bytes
> These files were downloaded from ftp.funet.fi (gcc mirror).
> I make an directory:
> c:\>md gcc
> c:\>cd gcc
> c:\>copy \gcc-20020422.tar.bz2 .
> 1 file(s) copied
> c:>unzip32 \gcc31s2.zip
> ..........
> c:>build gcc-20020422.tar.bz2
>
> then the file is bunziped, ......, and I get errors, may be the scripts
> were outdated?
> after some corrections in unpack-gcc.sh, I succeeded to run autoconf, ....
> but build process breaks in many points.
> I have used the latest (april) versions of sed, perl, bash, etc.....
> downloaded from clio.
> Do you build the gcc-snapshots using gcc31s2.zip under win9x or under linux?
Under Win98SE. It's difficult to say where is the problem. If You're using
djdev203.zip make sure You have latest update and You should additionally
patch include/sys/djtypes.h (definition of _DJ_va_list is wrong there,
one should use __builtin_va_list fore gcc-3.X)
> Is gcc31s2.zip outdated?
It seems to become outdated rather quickly. So usually You should make
sure You have both recent this file and recent GCC snapshot.
> Do you use the public gcc snapshots released under ftp?, or do you use
> cvs versions?
Only CVS versions (I'm testing CVS version of GCC-3.1 under Linux
anyway it's not a problem). I haven't tried public snapshots, so You may
need to modify scripts, but they should work for upcoming gcc-3.1 release
> Do you use another set of scripts?
I haven't used build.bat for rather long time and now I have also deleted
it as obsolete. Use build.sh instead. Also I suggest to update gcc31s2.zip
as I put out a newer one (from yesterday's build)
Andris
- Raw text -