| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
| From: | Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Trouble of using very large arrays |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:08:38 -0400 |
| Lines: | 32 |
| Message-ID: | <c6cb68$aht8h$4@ID-227552.news.uni-berlin.de> |
| References: | <c68d6j$g57$03$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> <c68e70$96gqq$1 AT ID-231750 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de> <c68u9l$9fevb$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de> <urih80l3b6om4kbblr8jthpjbm1i7cp6gc AT 4ax DOT com> <4088E94D DOT 8070508 AT acm DOT org> <c6bafb$a9mhn$2 AT ID-227552 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de> <c6bf2n$a164m$1 AT ID-79865 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | user-2ive6t3.dialup.mindspring.com (165.247.27.163) |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Trace: | news.uni-berlin.de 1082765320 11072785 I 165.247.27.163 ([227552]) |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
| X-Accept-Language: | en-us, en, de, fr, ru, zh, ja |
| In-Reply-To: | <c6bf2n$a164m$1@ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de> |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Alex Vinokur wrote:
> "Martin Ambuhl" <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net> wrote in message news:c6bafb$a9mhn$2 AT ID-227552 DOT news DOT uni-berlin DOT de...
>
>>Cesar Rabak wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Brian Inglis escreveu:
>>
>>> > this is cleaner and more maintainable:
>>> >
>>> > a = malloc(rows * columns * sizeof *a);
>>> >
>>>This is not a good advice: you're changing the allocation of an object
>>>of (rows x columns) ints to another of (rows x columns) pointers to int.
>>
>>You are, I regret to say, in error. The type of *a is int, not
>>pointers-to-int.
>>
>
>
> You are right. So,
> a = malloc(rows * columns * sizeof a);
Huh? Why change the correct
a = malloc(rows * columns * sizeof *a);
to something that's wrong?
The fact is that
ptr = malloc(number * sizeof *ptr);
is the accepted, common C idiom here, no matter what the type of ptr.
That's the point.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |