Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:11:49 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: -src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a
Message-ID:	<20011120021149.GA9216@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20011120010754 DOT GB8354 AT redhat DOT com> <004d01c17161$4f0a5c50$b09d3fcb AT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <20011120013221 DOT GA8684 AT redhat DOT com> <OE65TLmAtwRuCPpLAJM00013ca3 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<OE65TLmAtwRuCPpLAJM00013ca3@hotmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:07:07PM +1100, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>> I was thinking that we just needed a category "all" that could be
>> selected.  I don't think that adding YA window is the way to go.
>>
>> You don't think that being able to select/deselect all of a package would
>> solve this?
>
>I think the addition of a metapackages category RSN - would be the first
>priority ... any additional things on top of that could wait for more then a
>few moments.

We're debating whether this is the correct thing to do or not.  I'm not
convinced.  Providing the opinion that you think this is a first
priority doesn't advance the discussion very much.

>Although I dont know if 'metapackages' is the most intuitive name 'Standard
>Installs' - if it was possible to have a 2 word category ...
>not sure what would be a good name really...

You can have two word categories.

cgf

- Raw text -